The control tower playbook for Tiruppur factories
How three KM Garments units cut overdue orders 40% in one quarter — a step-by-step from the floor.
How three KM Garments units cut overdue orders 40% in one quarter — a step-by-step from the floor.
When KM Garments brought us in, their three units in Tiruppur were running on twelve WhatsApp groups, four spreadsheets, and a whiteboard that nobody trusted after 11am. Orders slipped not because the teams were slow, but because no one could see the whole board at once.
A control tower is not a new piece of software you bolt on. It is a discipline: one screen that every role looks at, updated by the work itself rather than by someone remembering to update it. Here is the exact sequence we used to get there in a single quarter.
Every conversation on the floor was really about an order — fabric pending, a sampling delay, a buyer changing a size break. We moved each of those from a chat message to a field on the order itself. The rule was simple: if it is not on the order, it did not happen.
Cutting, stitching, finishing, packing, dispatch — each order sits in exactly one stage, and each stage shows how long the order has been there. Ageing is the signal. An order that has been in finishing for four days when the average is one is a problem you can see before the buyer calls.
The owner, the unit managers, and the merchandiser open the same view at 9am. They do not discuss everything — only the red rows. Within three weeks, the standup shrank from forty minutes to under ten, because the board had already done the triage.
The 40% drop in overdue orders did not come from working harder. It came from everyone finally looking at the same board — and the board telling them where to look first.